From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Sep  5 23:34:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA28978
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 23:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca13-02.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA28954
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 23:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id XAA22387; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 23:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 23:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609060633.XAA22387@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: james@nexis.net
CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.95.960905103930.2180A-100000@bdd.net> (message from James FitzGibbon on Thu, 5 Sep 1996 10:44:24 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: Naming ports ?
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * There has been in the past a 951220, 960127, 960328, 960528, 960904, etc.
 * How should I name this port ?
 * 
 * ascend-radius-1.16
 * ascend-radius-960904
 * ascend-radius-1.16-960904
 * ascend-radius-1.16pl? (? being the number of patches they've done so far)

My recommendations would be

ascend-radius-96.09.04 (cf. wine)
ascend-radius-1.16.1

Satoshi