From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Mar 14 20:51:56 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 220D437B400; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2F4prlv081798;
	Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:51:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2F4ocoX081793;
	Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:50:38 -0800
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CVS Issues with branch.. Was: Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( "1 week Feature Slush" )
Message-ID: <20020314205038.A81751@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <xzpwuwesgrj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020314213422.4489F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020314213422.4489F-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:36:30PM -0500
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:36:30PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> It's worth noting, BTW, that originally the release engineering team
> planned to use Perforce for this to avoid the branch issue entirely,
> minimize impact on the main tree, etc, but decided not to due to the high
> volume of complaints on the topic.

You would get no complaints from me.  I think this would be a very good
use of Perforce.  In the past the WC -CURRENT snapshots were not tagged
or branched w/in CVS.  I don't see that the requirement to do so has been
demanded.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message