From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 23 12:34:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893D915396 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:34:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id VAA17865 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 21:34:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA47161 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:29:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: Softupdates - alpha code? Date: 23 Nov 1999 20:29:08 +0100 Message-ID: <81epu4$1e1b$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brent wrote: > IMPORTANT NOTE: The Soft Updates code is currently in ALPHA test. > Use at your own risk! Well, that is Kirk's official stance. From the FreeBSD point of view, softupdates can be considered stable. naddy@bigeye[~] /sbin/mount /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local, writes: sync 19 async 4587) mfs:25 on /tmp (mfs, asynchronous, local, writes: sync 2 async 1839) /dev/da0s1e on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 383 async 64043) /dev/da0s1f on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 14757 async 97615) /dev/da0s1g on /home (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 124 async 15943) /dev/da0s1h on /home/ncvs (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 2 async 15339) kernfs on /kern (kernfs, local) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) pid89@bigeye:/mnt on /mnt (nfs) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message