Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:12:23 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        nsayer@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sysctl interface for apm? 
Message-ID:  <200007171912.NAA63248@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:15:18 PDT." <39734D36.5FC7DDA@sftw.com> 
References:  <39734D36.5FC7DDA@sftw.com>  <3971F574.B492B904@softweyr.com> <1884.963737703@critter.freebsd.dk> <200007171753.LAA62543@harmony.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <39734D36.5FC7DDA@sftw.com> Nick Sayer writes:
: The "why bother" is easy -- one should not have to belong to group
: operator to determine the current battery state. Too many things
: already have to be sgid (at least) without making this another reason.

You should already be a member of group operator so that you can
suspend your machine :-).

However, wouldn't it be much simpler and easier to make apm world
readable instead?  Hmmm, and hack apm.c to open readonly.  Hmmm, there
are other problems with that since you can do the nasty things...  But
those should be fixed.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007171912.NAA63248>