From owner-freebsd-net Tue Sep 7 19:48:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF95314F28 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:48:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA46288; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:46:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Kurakin Roman , Sabrina Minshall Cc: archie@whistle.com, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NETGRAPH compiling problem In-Reply-To: <37CFE08A.23F2633A@cronyx.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org After a couple of requests I've updated the netgraph code to compile under 4.0 and 3.3RC. The ftp server at Whistle is not yet updated but the new tar files are available from http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/ (via links) There are 2 tarballs, one for 3.x and one for -current (4.0). I have only briefly tested these, though we use this code heavily in a 3.1++ system in production. Specifically I have only tested them in kld usage and have not yet run them in a 'compiled in' setup, (though I can't see why it would be different). The README is still valid though the names of the tarfiles are slightly different (tar xvf netgraph.tar.3.X or netgraph.tar.4.0 vs tar xvf netgraph.tar) As before this give a working (and tested by MCI!) frame relay implementation (among other nice tricks). julian On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Kurakin Roman wrote: > Hi, > > I have problem with compiling netgraph version 8. Compiler said the > there is no any variable > NGF_TYPE1. What should I do to compile netgraph. > > (FreeBSD 4.0-199908270CURRENT) > > > > Kurakin Roman > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message