Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 23:08:25 -0700 From: Jason DiCioccio <geniusj@bluenugget.net> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>, David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, Alfatrion <alfatrion@cybertron.tmfweb.nl>, "Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" <brentb@loa.com>, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW or IPFILTER? Message-ID: <B67B2D46-BFA0-11D5-B5AB-0003930352A4@bluenugget.net> In-Reply-To: <20011012203938.E6274@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, October 12, 2001, at 08:39 , Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 01:11:17PM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: >> FTP works in passive and active mode using IPNat. >> >> map dc1 192.168.0.0/24 -> www.xxx.yyy.zzz/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp >> map dc1 192.168.0.0/24 -> www.xxx.yyy.zzz/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:60000 > > Except when the ftp proxy is panicing the kernel. When non-ftp data > was passed over port 21, up until recently, it could easily crash your > system. I've never seen this behavior before actually.. When was this fixed? Was it IPFilter or just IPFilter on FreeBSD? Cheers, -JD- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B67B2D46-BFA0-11D5-B5AB-0003930352A4>