Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:24:22 -0500 From: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> To: <jim@geekhouse.net> Cc: <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>, <dirk@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: A Newer OpenSSL Port? Message-ID: <001701c080ed$64053040$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> References: <007701c080c7$34b9e860$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <20010117160530.A71104@envy.geekhouse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 at 15:50:55 -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > I'm running 4.1-REL, and am working on porting the SRP implementation > > from Stanford. > > > > Their implementation of SRP relies on openssl-0.9.6. According to > > what I see in /usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h, the OpenSSL that ships > > with 4.1-REL is 0.9.4. > > > > Upgrading to 4.2-REL won't help as it ships with 0.9.5a, which still > > isn't good enough. > > Upgrade to -STABLE. It has 0.9.6. Unfortunately this isn't an option at the present time. The machine has a fair bit of userland hacks and customisations which won't survive an upgrade. (This is the same reason why I have a few 3.x boxes which haven't migrated to 4.x yet. However, the 3.x machines can use openssl-0.9.5 which is in the ports. The 4.x machines can't.) This being said, is there much hazard in commenting out the FORBIDDEN line in the openssl port and doing a 'make clean; make install PREFIX=/usr'? -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001701c080ed$64053040$1200a8c0>