From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 4 20:25:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C3C16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:25:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886EA43D31 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:25:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from ob.icann.org ([192.0.35.106]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <200410042025350120044l93e> (Authid: domain_name_tsar); Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:25:35 +0000 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:25:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: spam maps In-Reply-To: <20041003124710.30828.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20041004132346.T778@bo.vpnaa.bet> References: <20041003124710.30828.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 & bind9: named.conf vs. named.sample ; why are they different? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:25:36 -0000 On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, spam maps wrote: > I have these two files in /var/named/etc/namedb, but > are different. > Is /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf redundant and old? If you've mergemaster'ed recently, named.conf will be the new one. > # diff -u /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf > /var/named/etc/namedb/named.sample We've never had a named.sample file in the tree. That is almost certainly something that you, or someone else working on that box created, probably by renaming an old named.conf. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection