From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 26 11:41:40 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAA637B405; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:40:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020226194044.ODDC1147.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:40:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA95144; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:22:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:22:30 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Warner Losh , Jake Burkholder , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 exception.s genassym.c machdep.c mp_machdep.c mpapic.c swtch.s vm_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include cpufunc.h pcb.h src/sys/i386/isa apic_vector.s clock.c icu_vector.s intr_machdep.c intr_machdep.h npx.c src/sys/kern ... In-Reply-To: <200202261822.g1QIMcK95505@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think the probelm is that there is a rule that says that disputed code should be backed out but ther eis no rule that gives an avenue of appeal whjen one committer is acting as a 'dog in teh manger' and just blocking everything, and requiring it to be held or reverted. JHB has had a 8 months to check in his stuff (hey the preemtion stuff was done in June) and since then it's only effect on the project has been to stiffle and stop all other development in the area. I blame P4 for this in part. HE thinks he is being transparent to the rest of the community whereas he has a total viewing public of about 4. Consider this a test case. Core is appealled to. The blocking action of JHB's (good) work is doing more damage to the project than good. We need to be able to proceed without waiting for him... On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > : > :In message <200202261806.g1QI6GL94130@apollo.backplane.com> Matthew Dillon writes: > :: I will not back it out. JHB has had issues with every single goddamn > :: thing I've tried to do that has been SMP related. JHB has had > :: patches going stale in P4 related to just about every file I've ever > :: had to touch. > :: > :: He has cried wolf one too many times. It is totally inappropriate for > :: JHB to put a lock on the entire SMP subsystem. > :: > :: JHB needs to get his act together. > : > :Matt, > : These patches are in dispute and should not have been > :committed. Please respect the FreeBSD process and back them out. > :This is totally unacceptible in the prioject. While you may have some > :points about how smpng has been run, they do not justify this flagrant > :violation of long standing project proceedures. Please back them out > :now. > : > :Warner > > I can only repeat what I've now said about a billion times. JHB has > no right to arbitrarily hold up my SMP contributions. If he had done > it just once it would not have been a problem. I have no problem working > with developers who are truely interested in working together. > > But he has done it four times now and that is one time too many. I > do not believe that he has the right. > > Core will have to back this out. And if core does back this out I > promise you that I will not rest until it goes back in. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message