From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 6 06:52:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA18413 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 06:52:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from adam.adonai.net (adam.adonai.net [207.8.83.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA18401 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 06:52:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leec@adam.adonai.net) Received: from localhost (leec@localhost) by adam.adonai.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA12352; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 08:52:31 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 08:52:31 -0600 (CST) From: "Lee Crites (AEI)" To: Doug White cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnu compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Doug White wrote: =>gcc is an integral part of the system. Upgrading gcc is not an easy task. =>There are lots of custom hacks in it. It's a _lot_ easier to just upgrade =>the entire OS while you're at it. Cute... So, Sir Douglas of White; Let's say some individual (as a purely theoretical example, mind you...), not knowing this tidbit, decided to just download the latest and greatest gnu stuff and compiled it. Are we (ahhhh, I mean, is *he*...) looking at reinstalling stuff from the cd? Will this impact future installs? Lee