From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 13 7: 6:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8961572D for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:06:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16487 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:06:44 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA79100 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:06:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from lucifer.bart.nl (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4914155D9; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:03:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@lucifer.bart.nl) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.bart.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA18831; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:03:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:03:25 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Yoshinobu Inoue Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 9th patch] Message-ID: <20000113160325.H16498@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000113190332M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000113235633I.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000113235633I.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>; from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp on Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 11:56:33PM +0900 Organisation: bART Internet Services B.V. Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20000113 16:00], Yoshinobu Inoue (shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) wrote: >> Sorry for delay, but apps for tcp IPv6 is near to come, >> but before that, I would like to announce small patches >> related to libc rcmd support for people who wish to try such >> as openssh build with IPv6 support. >> >> http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/rcmd.20000113 > >This seems to be necessary for openssh port committer, sumikawa, >so I'll commit this soon. It looked alright based on my hasty reading of it, except one function actually has the same name as another function but with a 2 appended to it. Not one of the best solutions IMHO. Then again, I am no network code expert and this may be perfectly acceptable to others. =) -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator bART Internet Services / Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message