From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 6 17:42:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494301065675 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radiomlodychbandytow@o2.pl) Received: from moh2-ve1.go2.pl (moh2-ve1.go2.pl [193.17.41.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72568FC0C for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moh2-ve1.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.186]) by moh2-ve1.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4B544E4A7 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:42:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.42]) by moh2-ve1.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:42:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from host892524678.com-promis.3s.pl [89.25.246.78] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id GhzMWQ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:42:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4F3010E0.6060302@o2.pl> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:41:52 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW8gbcWCb2R5Y2ggYmFuZHl0w7N3?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Thyer References: <20120130214146.19B3D1065754@hub.freebsd.org> <4F2EA461.7050308@o2.pl> In-Reply-To: X-O2-Trust: 2, 68 X-O2-SPF: neutral X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:53:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD current Subject: Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:42:04 -0000 On 2012-02-06 08:40, Matt Thyer wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2012 3:50 AM, "Radio młodych bandytów" > > wrote: > > > > I wonder if I'm the only one thinking about a decentralised package > management.... > > First, a decentralised transport layer. Torrents are faster and more > reliable than servers. > > Second, decentralised management when anybody can upload a port > directly into the system. > > > > -- > > Twoje radio > > > > Such a system would need to support traditional protocols such as FTP > & HTTP due to many corporate environments not allowing anything else. > > I'm all for a distributed system but you can't forget the corporate users. > True. While some corporations are moving to P2P software distribution already, it's a long way before it becomes standard. -- Twoje radio