From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 17:52:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5998A37B580; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:52:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 49EDB1C64; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:52:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:52:26 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Steve Price Cc: Rob Wise , Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vulnerable ports awaiting fix Message-ID: <20000712205226.C4034@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <20000712195001.L52759@bsd.planetwe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000712195001.L52759@bsd.planetwe.com>; from sprice@hiwaay.net on Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 07:50:01PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 07:50:01PM -0500, Steve Price wrote: > I looked into it about a week ago and was going to work up a set > of patches for 1.4h2 which is supposed to have this fixed, but it > turned out the layout of the files in the tarball changed quite a > bit since 1.2. :( _Quite._ > If you do work up something I wouldn't mind reviewing it. However, > your best bet would be to run any changes by Bill Fumerola, > billf@freebsd.org, who maintains this port. ..... poorly. I haven't really touched it since assuming control, and we're using nocol (or we will be soon) so I wouldn't object to someone with a amount of freetime that is non-negative taking it over. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect / Computer Horizons Corp - CHIMES e-mail: billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message