Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:25:10 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Randall Stewart <rrs@cisco.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KTR and SCTP Message-ID: <20070614022510.GA61989@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <46706E63.1080906@cisco.com> References: <46706E63.1080906@cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:23:31PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: > All: > > I am in the process of converting all the logging that > SCTP does to use the KTR sub-system. This will fit > nicely.. I still need to do some things to make it > so I can pull out the logs and make pretty charts and > graphs (in SCTP its used for debugging but also exploring > how CC and other niceties works).. > > But I was wondering.. would anyone mind if I took > KTR_SPARE2 > > and made it: > > KTR_SCTP_SUBSYS > > I have a huge amount of tracing under SCTP now.. so > many I am setting in a seperate mask set to enable/disable > various pieces of it.. So I was thinking it would > warrent a sub-system of its own :-D > > Any objections? If not I will change it :-D Yeah, we really do need to keep those spare fields for local use. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070614022510.GA61989>