From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 01:26:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2871B16A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org) Received: from ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net (ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net [150.101.162.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0401943D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (sarah.zone2.earthmagic.org [192.168.2.3]) by ppp162-248.static.internode.on.net (Postfix-MSA) with ESMTP id 7B41F91F1 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:26:04 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <43C06A2B.9030603@earthmagic.org> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:26:03 +1100 From: Johny Mattsson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051003) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <43BD2794.8020000@cnptia.embrapa.br> <43C01C75.6020504@FreeBSD.org> <43C0652D.90709@FreeBSD.org> <43C066B4.3060505@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <43C066B4.3060505@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Postfix and faststart X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:26:07 -0000 On 01/08/06 12:11, Mike Jakubik wrote: > I think the port should also depend on a database server, if it has been > compiled with one or any other of the supported configuration options. > I'm not sure if this can be dynamically generated based on ports > configuration though. Maybe it would be useful to have a dummy DATABASE milestone, since I imagine there are many applications that do depends on various databases (mail & webservers being the first to come to mind). Having a DATABASE milestone would allow for good decoupling between the individual apps and the various databases. Databases would "BEFORE: DATABASE", and apps depending on them could simply "REQUIRE: DATABASE" and not have to worry about whether it was compiled with a postgresql, mysql or someothersql database. Just a thought, and possibly not the most well-considered one at that, but I figured it might be worthwhile enough to share :) Cheers, /Johny -- Johny Mattsson - Making IT work ,-. ,-. ,-. When all else fails, http://www.earthmagic.org _.' `-' `-' Murphy's Law still works!