From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 15 15:23:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F81A16A513 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:23:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ex-nihilo-llc.com (ex-nihilo-llc.com [206.114.147.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C18A43D60 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron@alpete.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ex-nihilo-llc.com [206.114.147.90]) by ex-nihilo-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59A58340CE for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:28:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Aaron Peterson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040615162450.G12659@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> References: <1087308077.84043.47.camel@main> <20040615162450.G12659@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iTE7HW6+jdxHPoqMy4wx" Message-Id: <1087312980.84043.55.camel@main> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:23:00 -0400 Subject: Re: Can't boot install cd (Compaq DL380) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: aaron@alpete.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:23:01 -0000 --=-iTE7HW6+jdxHPoqMy4wx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Hi! >=20 > Well, ok, I assume that you got a Dl 380 Generation 1, with the white > case, and also 4U form factor, that has an ida RAID controller as > PCI-card. That is correct. > I had one of those running with FreeBSD 4.7, later updated to 4.8-stable > with cvsup. > Ok, I had only one CPU in, and I had the OS type in SETUP set to NT4. Do > not set to > linux or SCO, that could impose problems. I checked the OS setting in Setup. It was set to NT, however changing it to anything besides NT only seemed to change one of the PCI boards from using IRQ 5 to use IRQ 10 instead. I don't think that would make the difference anyway, but what do I know. Any other ideas? Aaron --=-iTE7HW6+jdxHPoqMy4wx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAzxRUeJcyAiXpNL8RAvC5AKCZrWeQDgjWZWtkbM+iFN6Xu7+6mwCeKpoJ 4engc77nJUo4wy3AUlN8ezs= =SeKk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iTE7HW6+jdxHPoqMy4wx--