From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 1 5:11:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (a96180.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.96.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB0F37B404 for ; Wed, 1 May 2002 05:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 133F42171; Wed, 1 May 2002 14:11:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:11:51 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai To: Daniel Eischen Cc: Archie Cobbs , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in pthread_cancel() Message-ID: <20020501121151.GR66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <200204302302.g3UN2aS89479@arch20m.dellroad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Ninth Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20020501 05:45], Daniel Eischen (eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com) wrote: >Hmm, what about just bypassing the pthread_cancel() if the >thread is already in the process of exiting? Makes sense to me. And the testcase in the PR is solved adequately with it? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono asmodai@wxs.nl, finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/ | http://www.tendra.org/ Everything Zen, I don't think so... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message