From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jun 23 9:40: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D84037B401 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5NGe3e27008; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200106231640.f5NGe3e27008@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mike Wiacek Subject: Re: bin/28311: ftpd and sshd do not honor expired pw entries Reply-To: Mike Wiacek Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/28311; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Wiacek To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, mike@sentex.net Cc: Subject: Re: bin/28311: ftpd and sshd do not honor expired pw entries Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:31:35 -0400 ftpd does check for expired passwords, when not using PAM, however by default, ftpd does use pam, and this check is not performed. The patch from bin/20952 does the expiration check but it doesn't use pam to perform the check. The one from here, uses the abstration that pam provides to check for expiration, and when it is compiled without pam, the pre-existing code will perform the check... Its really a matter of preference though :-) Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message