Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:34:14 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: John Saunders <john@nlc.net.au> Cc: FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: inetd and libwrap issue Message-ID: <19990622103414.A16793@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <00e901bebc8c$e357ad90$6cb611cb@scitec.com.au>; from John Saunders on Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 06:54:50PM %2B1000 References: <00e901bebc8c$e357ad90$6cb611cb@scitec.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 06:54:50PM +1000, John Saunders wrote: > Does a SIGHUP work here, the man page doesn't mention it? You shouldn't need to send a SIGHUP after changing hosts.allow, only after changing inetd.conf, however there is a bug in the 3.2 version of inetd where it can get confused about service names when you HUP it, which can upset the wrappers support. It has been fixed in current and will be fixed in -stable shortly. Maybe we should have an errata entry about this? I've answered this question several times, and as more people try the builtin wrapping in 3.2 RELEASE more people will ask? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990622103414.A16793>