From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 2 17:35:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D460616A40F for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC6343D5D for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:35:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id o37so141295nzf for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:35:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rU+1NTFyLgKPyfDEcG4sKxTY3cTv3hNuAeu7+eaXJpfG55sFuplB9gNK1yD5N14ZwPWOyKK8AwxtK2oxd4Tgo0PbDet00Q5snDskrpXGbPIZhRpV355RSbDgXKx+enxlj0D5ZQ1dOsXH7R7RiieU/MIR2fE5w4OaldN7pxB2h2Y= Received: by 10.35.8.13 with SMTP id l13mr1308151pyi.1162488923154; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.118.6 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:35:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0611020935q44bcd08dxe91deb6e6e7a5fe5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:35:22 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Scott Long" In-Reply-To: <454A1E47.9060200@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <454A1E47.9060200@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Polstra Subject: Re: Silly IRQ allocation on Dell 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:35:26 -0000 On 11/2/06, Scott Long wrote: > This is typical Dell, and it gets even worse if you have a laptop. > Imagine every PCI device being on the sole interrupt line that is routed > on the motherboard. Growing MSI support would get around this for bce > and many other devices. > > Scott Well, guess we need stronger fertilizer so it grows faster :) Seriously though, MSI implementation is happening. The em driver wants it also :) Jack