From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 3 17:55: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from scds.com (d122-h010.rh.rit.edu [129.21.122.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6807914BFE for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 17:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jseger@jseger.scds.com) Received: from jseger.scds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scds.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA43467; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:29:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jseger@jseger.scds.com) Message-Id: <199909032029.QAA43467@scds.com> To: Ade Lovett Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/tclX75 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:56:34 CDT." <19990903135634.K9489@lovett.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:29:28 -0400 From: "Justin M. Seger" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 01:33:46PM -0400, Justin M. Seger wrote: > > Anyone have any objections to me nuking lang/tclX75? Nothing appears > > to use it anymore. > > Should we extend this to cleaning up all tcl/tk related stuff other > than 8.x versions? > > With the release of tcl/tk 8.2, it seems to be a little silly to be > keeping the really ancient 7.x and 4.x series around. > > All IMO, of course. That is one goal, however we just can't nuke tcl 7.5... We need to fix all ports that depend on it. If you'd like to help with this, send in patches that fix things. I'm asking about tclX75 because it is old, and nothing else depends on it. Justin Seger To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message