From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 20 19:58:41 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C2C16A41F;
	Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:58:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF9943D48;
	Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k0KJwala021373; 
	Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:58:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:58:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601201458110.1773-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>,
	Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kernel thread as real threads..
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:58:41 -0000

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote:

> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >>Does pthreads allow the programmer to name threads in a user and/or
> >>kernel visible way?  Is this something that is really all that
> >>important?
> >
> >
> > Only in a non-portable way.  See pthread_set_name_np(3).
> >
>
> Well, for the time being, I can't see why we can't specifically
> name kthreads and use the process name for user threads.

I think that makes more sense anyway.

-- 
DE