Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:04:26 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Using Instruction Pointer address in debug interfaces [Was: Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]] Message-ID: <2A8EC8AF-7A4D-4335-8B35-18987A583F42@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4EBABAC1.2090003@freebsd.org> References: <CACqU3MU_Bk%2BcObCiUa2XtM7fLkSpSDzOZqoZ=khNOR-_6ptYYQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EB9C469.9070208@freebsd.org> <CACqU3MWkcKZ2cjh_VJueWUpOS7dzhu%2BMh8yYWVA8X9B9ykOW7w@mail.gmail.com> <4EB9E6FE.3060102@freebsd.org> <CACqU3MUjxFOBGF4zib=Wz6Vrt=Jrsur03g_U4-g4hg0iEnpVSA@mail.gmail.com> <4EBABAC1.2090003@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/11/2011, at 4:09, Julian Elischer wrote: > well write a driver for it.. what do you think I'm doing with the = driver I'm talking about? > I wrote several bypass network card drivers when I was at = cisco/ironport.. it's not rocket science, > though it would be nice if we were to come up with a standard = interface for bypass interfaces. > That is a different topic though.. http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/ Perhaps? -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2A8EC8AF-7A4D-4335-8B35-18987A583F42>