From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Tue Sep 11 07:11:35 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAD31081AED for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Received: from mail.bsd4all.net (mail.bsd4all.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:217b::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.bsd4all.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78025895F3 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:11:26 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=gojira.at; s=mail201809; t=1536649886; bh=KvXMtasSrp2wDCoRAOE/2aomIAJVLJymyLnIyqo6LmE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:from:to: subject:date:content-type:mime-version:message-id; b=FDitCz4h8C87+3IsQNX7FpiKK+dA03z9ZImpyqFFXukS5tIwssjcPyp0dh9scI4Od FvMT1dxs3KUx1I/VEcpy/u4CEM/GWLSxPbPOGoVcbAKpfpxWNsXFiZjD/iXiMUuny/ c4fjy9uz9S29H3lMqNEEvWb5Q/iOvAKwe0Xt1YV3jMet/IujnYVyqnA5U6pFVSlJSP qnyh9E6sPZI5QsASr68PcoJ5sEsoQ3QNJdaVH1IXb9D3HArmtCQ6VMai2+2pfepjIX BxgHsEj7JOyZSsMC7Iw3Or1i36t4aEXr47aYKnT1MhtytR0IuZSp10A7ErizbRAKtS iUYLNODzt5qmQ== From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is make release broken? Message-ID: <20180911071126.f5g6542lngym7jpj@mail.bsd4all.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:11:36 -0000 On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:35:15PM -0700, Lee Brown wrote: > apologies if this is the wrong mailing list. Before I file a bug report, am > I doing this wrong? > > I'm trying to build an 11.2 releng on a 11.1 release box and am having > trouble with the 'make release' step. I've reduced the build script to > this, which is almost the same as described in release(7) except the > working directory. Expected EoL of releng/11.1 is September 30, 2018. > When it tries to execute makefs in line 58 of release/amd64/mkisoimages.sh > it's using an option -o platformid=efi which is unrecognised, the setup is > on line 41. > > Thanks for looking and any /hints/smack up the side of the head/ are > welcome. I thought the general rule was you could build version X.* from > version (X-1).* > > newfs_msdos: trim 25 sectors to adjust to a multiple of 63 > /dev/md0: 1532 sectors in 1532 FAT12 clusters (512 bytes/cluster) > BytesPerSec=512 SecPerClust=1 ResSectors=1 FATs=2 RootDirEnts=512 > Sectors=1575 Media=0xf8 FATsecs=5 SecPerTrack=63 Heads=1 HiddenSecs=0 > makefs: Unknown option `platformid' > usage: makefs [-t fs-type] [-o fs-options] [-d debug-mask] [-B endian] > [-S sector-size] [-M minimum-size] [-m maximum-size] [-R roundup-size] > [-s image-size] [-b free-blocks] [-f free-files] [-F mtree-specfile] > [-xZ] [-N userdb-dir] [-T ] > image-file directory | manifest [extra-directory ...] > sh /work/11.2-releng/src/release/amd64/make-memstick.sh disc1 memstick.img > Calculated size of `memstick.img.part': 686432256 bytes, 11997 inodes > Extent size set to 8192 > memstick.img.part: 654.6MB (1340688 sectors) block size 8192, fragment size > 1024 > using 13 cylinder groups of 54.52MB, 6979 blks, 1024 inodes. > super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: > 144, 111808, 223472, 335136, 446800, 558464, 670128, 781792, > 893456, 1005120, 1116784, 1228448, 1340112, > Populating `memstick.img.part' > Image `memstick.img.part' complete > mkimg: invalid option -- a > mkimg: error: unknown option Known issue: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=333005 -- Herbert