From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 10:12:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CD1106564A for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (202-172-126-254.cpe.qld-1.comcen.com.au [202.172.126.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C058FC1B for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.175] (unknown [192.168.0.175]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBFA409B for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:52:02 +1000 (EST) From: Da Rock To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20081207121431.5dcb37f9@gom.home> References: <4be2da2e0812062344y26eddcc9sf589531d10c71a1c@mail.gmail.com> <20081207093713.O5433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081207082932.04a7cf16@scorpio> <11167f520812070853i3b6fa6dei6e5c71669416470@mail.gmail.com> <20081207191727.V1610@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081207193517.GA20905@laverenz.de> <20081207121431.5dcb37f9@gom.home> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:51:22 +1000 Message-Id: <1228733482.4495.14.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:12:30 -0000 On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 12:14 -0800, prad wrote: > On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:35:17 +0100 > Uwe Laverenz wrote: > > > Who is "most freebsd users"? > > > i would think most are interested in running servers or routers or > possible scientific applications or engaged in os study and appreciate > its simplicity and consistency. > > i don't think it can compete with linux in terms of some of the bells > and whistles that the desktop offers, but imho, a lot of those bells > ring out of tune and the whistles result in sore lips. > The possibility here is the bells and whistles strangely enough DO work in tune and without sore lips... FreeBSD could be THAT good.