From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 30 07:22:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A779516A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:22:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gvr.gvr.org (gvr-gw.gvr.org [80.126.103.228])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5524E43D5A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:22:46 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from guido@gvr.org)
Received: by gvr.gvr.org (Postfix, from userid 657)
	id 9F32738; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:22:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:22:45 +0200
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>
To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Message-ID: <20040830072245.GA12692@gvr.gvr.org>
References: <20040827082929.GA64830@gvr.gvr.org>
	<200408280201.10816.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20040829191558.GA4616@gvr.gvr.org>
	<200408300837.08339.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200408300837.08339.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: project evil: signal quality
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:22:46 -0000

On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:37:08AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 04:45, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > Thanks, The reason I asked is because I normally use wicontrol -i ndis0:
> > ...
> > Comms quality/signal/noise:             [ 0 0 0 ]
> > ...
> >
> > As you see, in that screen, it appears comms quality is unavailable..
> 
> Ahh strange..
> It works fine here (Intel Pro 2100).
> 
> Are newer drivers available?
> 

Given that your ndis0 -l option for wicontrol works here, I doubt that this
is a driver issue. I'll try to find time to look why -i ndis0 fails
to report the quality..

-Guido