From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 12 21:32:40 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA22863 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:32:40 -0700 Received: from specgw.spec.co.jp (specgw.spec.co.jp [202.32.13.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA22853 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:32:34 -0700 Received: from tama3.spec.co.jp (tama3 [202.32.13.252]) by specgw.spec.co.jp (8.6.5/3.3Wb-SPEC) with SMTP id NAA27914; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 13:25:05 +0900 Message-Id: <9506130434.AA00041@tama3.spec.co.jp.spec.co.jp> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 13:34:34 +0900 From: Atsushi Murai To: tom@uniserve.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GENERIC kernel & some basic UNIX pointers In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: AL-Mail 0.94Beta Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Tom Samplonius wrote: : :On Tue, 13 Jun 1995, Atsushi Murai wrote: : :> Sorry I don't have data for handy but when I try to ping the other side :> which is running iij-ppp with the compression by ISDN TA, I can get a RTP :> around 50ms. : : Is that considered good? Sorry I don't know myself :) But I get 141ms :on a 28.8k link. Half of 141 is 70, which is pretty close to 50. But :that is only comparing 57.6k to 64k. I think it's not bad against pppd(kernel-ppp). process interruption will be occured every 10ms(?) as CPU ticks. :Tom -- Atsushi Murai E-Mail: amurai@spec.co.jp SPEC Voice : +81-3-3833-5341 System Planning and Engineering Corp.