Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Nov 1997 00:24:20 +0000
From:      "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Is this a known problem in 2.2.2-R?
Message-ID:  <346F8EB4.331CCB07@asme.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello;
I know there were some VM patches for 2.2.5, perhaps they will fix the
message I get in 2.2.2 ?
______________
...

fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa
fdc0: NEC 72065B
fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in
wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 flags 0x80ff on isa
wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): <NEC Corporation D3747>, multi-block-16
wd0: 1547MB (3170160 sectors), 3145 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
wdc0: unit 1 (atapi): <HITACHI CDR-7730/0008a>, removable, iordy
wcd0: 689Kb/sec, 128Kb cache, audio play, 128 volume levels, ejectable
tray
wcd0: medium type unknown, unlocked
npx0 flags 0x1 on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface

(After running X)

wd0s2b: reverting to non-multi sector mode reading fsbn 24408 of
24392-24423 (wd0s2 bn 89944; cn 89 tn 3 sn 43)wd0: status
59<rdy,seekdone,drq,err> error 40<uncorr>
___________________
Here is my exact /etc/fstab:
/dev/wd0s2b	none            swap    sw		0	0
/dev/wd0a	/               ufs     rw              1       1
/dev/wd0s1	/dos            msdos   rw              0       0
/dev/wd0s2f	/usr            ufs     rw              1       1
/dev/wd0s3e	/usr/share/fbsd ufs     rw,async        1       1
/dev/wd0s2e	/var            ufs     rw              1       1
proc		/proc           procfs  rw              0       0
/dev/wcd0c	/cdrom          cd9660  ro,noauto       0       0
#/dev/wd0s2b	/tmp            mfs     rw              0       0
___________________
And the result of df:
Filesystem  1K-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity  Mounted on
/dev/wd0a       31775    21163     8070    72%    /
/dev/wd0s1     498656   455864    42792    91%    /dos
/dev/wd0s2f    728471   606166    64028    90%    /usr
/dev/wd0s3e    228551    43421   166846    21%    /usr/share/fbsd
/dev/wd0s2e     29727     2376    24973     9%    /var
procfs              4        4        0   100%    /proc
___________________
No negative effect that I know of...anyway.

cheers,

	Pedro.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?346F8EB4.331CCB07>