From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 12 09:43:39 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA16964 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16959 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:43:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 1007pu-0009Ws-00; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:42:38 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Amancio Hasty cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SOFTUPDATES question In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:38:19 PST." <199901121738.JAA40015@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:42:38 +0200 Message-ID: <36633.916162958@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:38:19 PST, Amancio Hasty wrote: > soft updates eats up kernel memory . Is this in the context of a swapfs, or is that generally the case for softupdates? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message