Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Jul 1996 10:59:21 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey)
To:        hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty)
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers)
Subject:   Re: gcc lies?
Message-ID:  <199607070859.KAA15494@allegro.lemis.de>
In-Reply-To: <199607070830.BAA00607@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Jul 7, 96 01:30:51 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Amancio Hasty writes:
>
> Dumb question , is gcc-1.42 a lot faster than gcc-2.x?

Good question.  The answer is 'yes', at least to go by what I've just
tried.  I compiled cccp.c (the GNU preprocessor) with both compilers
on a P133 with BSD/OS 2.1.  cc (1.42) took about 5.4 seconds, gcc
(2.7.2) took about 14 seconds.

I think Michael's right, though.  It's more a question of
compatibility than anything else.

Greg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607070859.KAA15494>