From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Nov 28 10:39:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from apoq.skynet.be (apoq.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A25C37B400 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by apoq.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FDA9CE6; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:39:38 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@195.238.1.45 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200011281752.JAA03370@implode.root.com> References: <200011281752.JAA03370@implode.root.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:35:57 +0100 To: dg@root.com From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Netbsd advances... Cc: joeo@cracktown.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 9:52 AM -0800 2000/11/28, David Greenman wrote: >> This brings up a good question -- does FreeBSD have a unified >>buffer cache? If not, is there a particular reason why? > > Yes, for many years now - since before FreeBSD 2.0. Cool. I like already having features for many years that others are just having now. ;-) -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message