From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 18:31:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B3C1065670; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531018FC0C; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185581FFC33; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F145845DB; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:29:15 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <20100620090019.GA1731@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <86wrtte830.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100622.102058.69891821692792062.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:29:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100622.102058.69891821692792062.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:20:58 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <86d3vi53b9.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: stefan@fafoe.narf.at, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, jilles@stack.nl, gcooper@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Further sh(1) plans X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:31:27 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > ~4k isn't worth a fuss. However, ~315k from libncurses and ~110k from > libedit is, Oh come on, they were there already. Don't blame tab completion for this. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no