From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 5 4:51:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D44E37B4C5 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 04:51:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id eA5Cp9W31712; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 13:51:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 13:51:09 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Garrett Wollman Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ABI is broken?? Message-ID: <20001105135109.A29323@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <3A005026.47B9978C@FreeBSD.org> <200011011835.eA1IZl207585@vashon.polstra.com> <3A006A58.E8315ABA@FreeBSD.org> <200011012019.PAA97860@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20001101144355.A75475@dragon.nuxi.com> <200011020426.XAA01712@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200011020426.XAA01712@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:26:33PM -0500 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001102 05:30], Garrett Wollman (wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) wrote: >< said: > >> Any reason to not get [libc ABI changes] in -current now and make >> the bump? > >Mostly because they're too small to be worth the pain. I'm waiting >for something more significant that I can piggy-back on. Which of course has the implicit risk that if something big doesn't show up these fixes will be added only at the nearing of 5.0-RELEASE and thus with less shake-down time. I also gather it has to do with the Austin project Garrett? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl In my mind nothing makes sense... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message