From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org  Wed Nov  4 22:19:29 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D17DA265D4
 for <freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  4 Nov 2015 22:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vixie@tisf.net)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org
 [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC671C50
 for <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 Nov 2015 22:19:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from vixie@tisf.net)
Received: from linux-85bq.suse (c-67-180-164-69.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [67.180.164.69])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D75113B25;
 Wed,  4 Nov 2015 22:19:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@tisf.net>
To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: C bhyve administration tool
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:19:27 -0800
Message-ID: <1557160.7OrEWMRSrv@linux-85bq.suse>
Organization: TISF
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.12-1-default; KDE/4.14.10; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAPS9+SsPL8UOHmM2VUQjGOY2jE-eYJOHZ9uPieNLjyTdZqc-RA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151103221930.GA50869@debnath.net>
 <CAE7bWBrD8QSZgrBX6ayj44qHM7NO09AP3u6w1=no5bE1qEJbYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPS9+SsPL8UOHmM2VUQjGOY2jE-eYJOHZ9uPieNLjyTdZqc-RA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:19:29 -0000

On Wednesday, November 04, 2015 09:56:53 PM Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Well,
> 
> in all honesty, getting vm managers to kvm equivalents ( ie virt-manager )
> should not be a goal. virt-manager and friends are terrible. Please
> envision something better!
> 
> Where it is hosted and what language it is written in doesn't really matter.
> 
> Just my 2 cents.

i'll add a nickel to those thoughts. libvirt isn't a library, virsh isn't a 
shell, and it all sucks so bad it blows. bhyve deserves something new.

-- 
P. Vixie