From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 00:42:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C09016A4B3 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [195.131.4.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B0343F85 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:42:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ip121-248.dialup.wplus.net (ip121-248.dialup.wplus.net [195.131.121.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ftp.translate.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9B7dG7R080412; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:39:17 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:48:02 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) Personal Organization: Home X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <906455232.20031011114802@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20031011014450.GA17491@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <22159707417.20031010130423@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F868513.4030607@gmx.net> <179171965963.20031010162842@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F86B135.5050001@fillmore-labs.com> <1223794327.20031011004107@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20031011014450.GA17491@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Oliver Eikemeier Subject: Re[2]: Ports conflicts: `lib/libiberty.a' X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 07:42:48 -0000 Hello, Kris! Saturday, October 11, 2003, 5:44:51 AM, you wrote: >> I think, it is invalid situation. Because DISABLE_CONFLICTS=yes >> could afraid some users and here is no conflicts, really, but >> overwriting of unused files. KK> The invalid situation is two ports installing the same file. That is KK> broken behaviour and should be fixed. Yes, I agree with you. And I'll try to fix this behavior in my binutils/gcc ports (and I'm maintaining 3 targets now -- mipsel-linux, mingw32 and msp430). But I afraid, that it will be big and ugly patches on Makefile.in files, which should be changed after each new release :( Lev Serebryakov