From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 13 02:53:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0FC16A419 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from ns.tydfam.jp (ns.tydfam.jp [61.197.228.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAD413C461 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from localhost (tyd3.sub.tydfam.jp [192.168.1.3]) by ns.tydfam.jp (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l8D2r5hZ015681; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:53:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:55:18 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20070913.115518.38718088.ken@tydfam.jp> To: mbowie@buzmo.com From: Ken Yamada In-Reply-To: <46E80076.60205@buzmo.com> References: <46E755FD.9020105@buzmo.com> <20070912.164853.35656687.ken@tydfam.jp> <46E80076.60205@buzmo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91/4260/Thu Sep 13 07:12:31 2007 on ns.tydfam.jp X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on ns.tydfam.jp Cc: dan@rucci.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse-Europa Web-browser X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:53:59 -0000 > > Do you have steps to reproduce the chooser bug? Does it occur in > build's against both 1.5 and 1.6 or are you running a 1.5 build against > a 1.6 JAVA_HOME? (Or visa versa.) It occurs on both 1.5 and 1.6 version. Preference -> Connectivity -> Driver Definitions -> Add -> Provide Driver Details -> Add jar/Zip ====> CORE DUMP!! > It would be great if we could roll the 1.5 and 1.6 ports into one... it > shouldn't be too tricky. I'd start looking at it now myself, but... jdk selection is not a problem, java5home etc., but I think that the patch file set selection by jdk15/jdk16 may become tricky.