From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 3 06:47:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA24374 for current-outgoing; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 06:47:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA24363 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 06:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA24164; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 08:46:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sjx-ca30-16.ix.netcom.com(204.31.235.176) by dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma024156; Sun Aug 3 08:46:10 1997 Received: (from asami@localhost) by blimp.mimi.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) id GAA01715; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 06:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 06:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199708031346.GAA01715@blimp.mimi.com> To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com CC: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19970803122321.15396@klemm.gtn.com> (message from Andreas Klemm on Sun, 3 Aug 1997 12:23:21 +0200) Subject: Re: Make this a relese coordinator decision (was Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk One more thing I forgot to mention.... * I think the only question is ... what has to be done now, * that ports are buildable under -current _AND_ -stable fine * without too much problems. Keeping -current and -stable as close as possible is one such way. That is why I've been merging many things from -current and -stable myself. If people, as they commit something to -current, can either merge it to -stable right away (for simple bugfixes) or at least make a note to merge it after a couple of weeks themselves, it will make our jobs much easier (and will also make the upcoming 2.2.5 release much better). Satoshi