Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:21:30 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223932] [request] License should be optional for metaports Message-ID: <bug-223932-13-j7sYHEkE19@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-223932-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-223932-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223932 --- Comment #14 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #12) > Anyway, the best we can do is add a LICENSE?=3D BSD2CLAUSE in > Mk/Uses/metaport.mk. IMHO if that's the case, than the LICENSE hook seems flawed. None of the options/solutions /really/ seem to be correct. More like duct tape, or an afterthought. Is there no relatively easy way to unhook LICENSE from META-ports? There really isn't a need for LICENSE to be involved in this case, as the individual (included) ports each declare their respective LICENSE. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-223932-13-j7sYHEkE19>