Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:56:01 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
To:        Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs
Message-ID:  <4C84E4E1.8010709@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100906122325.GA78727@icarus.home.lan>
References:  <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de> <AANLkTinYUz0V%2B2nSWBMYLf2fL8HnUQ-fvXT0q-5WY4bb@mail.gmail.com> <4C782D3B.6020407@icyb.net.ua> <201008271743.29393.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C7835E6.6070309@icyb.net.ua> <4C7A2782.5040009@freebsd.org> <4C84DBE6.5010809@freebsd.org> <20100906122325.GA78727@icarus.home.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
>>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending
>>> on the desired architecture:
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff
>>
>> I see that I am not getting as many testers as I expected, so I am going to commit
>> the patch.
>>
>> You still have a short while to either objectively object to the patch or to
>> voluntary test it :-)
> 
> I would gladly assist in testing this, except there doesn't appear to be
> an authoritative statement that it will apply to RELENG_8; when I see
> WIP, I assume -CURRENT/HEAD only.

patch -C is much better than any statement :)

> Let me know, since all the systems I have are Intel multi-core.

Yes, the patch should be applicable to stable/8 without any issues.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C84E4E1.8010709>