Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 13:19:52 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu> To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: workaround for NATd + CVSup? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970927131828.17243A-100000@server.local.sunyit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199709271158.OAA10787@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I guess this is an RTFM, but i got it, if you are running NATd for IP aliasing on a private IP network the option: -P - will have CVSup working for you. ._________________________________________ __ _ |Alfred Perlstein - Programming & SysAdmin for hire... |perlsta@sunyit.edu |http://www.cs.sunyit.edu/~perlsta : ---"Have you seen my FreeBSD tatoo?" ' ---"who was that masked admin?" On Sat, 27 Sep 1997, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Once Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > i'm running NATd so i can have more than one machine operating on only one > > IP address, but i think it is causing breakage with CVSup... > > > > does anyone know what ports and what type of traffic i have to have > > tunneled to the machine running cvsup? > > > > CVSup can operate in four modes: active, passive, multiplexed and SOCKS. > In your situation you can use either passive or multiplexed modes. > See man cvsup (-P option). > > -- > Ruslan A. Ermilov System Administrator > ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank > +380-652-247647 Simferopol, Crimea > 2426679 ICQ Network, UIN >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970927131828.17243A-100000>