Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:07:32 +0000
From:      "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: WITHOUT_TELNET=yes .. does it work?
Message-ID:  <56A320F3-A099-4DE6-84EE-7F9CCE3A5CB4@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <866398ue25.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <200911172043.28008.gnemmi@gmail.com> <20091118000838.60CBC1CC47@ptavv.es.net> <19e9a5dc0911171905r67f4e9c4q8513782cce8f5f82@mail.gmail.com> <367b2c980911180330x32407537qa6468d230936cb85@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911181228060.12162@fledge.watson.org> <866398ue25.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 18 Nov 2009, at 14:01, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:

> Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> writes:
>>> But someone (you, me...) can file a PR to add them to OLD_FILES when
>>> WITHOUT_TELNET is set to yes, like it's done for some other WITHOUT_
>>> options.
>> If it's done for other WITHOUT_ options, it's not obvious to me.
>=20
> tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
>=20
> Poor placement IMHO, we shouldn't have dependencies from src into =
tools.

Its obscure location explains why it doesn't work. :-) Maybe it should =
be src/OptionalFiles.inc? That said, it still sounds like a significant =
maintenance problem to me: we have a lot of WITHOUT_ options, and they =
may have non-trivial interactions...

Robert=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56A320F3-A099-4DE6-84EE-7F9CCE3A5CB4>