From owner-cvs-all Wed Oct 24 11:51:49 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from silby.com (cb34181-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.14.173.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E1637B405 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 78264 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Oct 2001 18:51:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Oct 2001 18:51:39 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:51:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-disk.c In-Reply-To: <200110241824.f9OIOAn77833@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20011024134810.C77798-100000@achilles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > des 2001/10/24 11:24:10 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/dev/ata ata-disk.c > Log: > Don't enable write cacheing on devices that don't support tagged queuing > unless hw.ata.wc is set. > > Approved by: sos > MFC after: 1 week Why are we changing this again? It was turned back on because without write caching many people reported huge slowdowns. Has there since been an influx of reports of huge losses of data on all versions other than 4.3? (Should I bring up the irony of the tagged-queueing IBM drives having a high failure rate? ) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message