Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 21:57:07 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237833] lang/ruby26: irb, rdoc, ri is broken Message-ID: <bug-237833-21402-j4Y7VDTzGa@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237833-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237833-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237833 --- Comment #18 from Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> --- (In reply to Koichiro Iwao from comment #16) Iwao-san, Sorry for late response. I tried removing this patch and saw what happened.= The result was that following gems were installed under /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6 (directory where rubygem ports install their files). * bundler 1.17.2 * did_you_mean 1.3.0 * irb 1.0.0 * minitest 5.11.3 * net-telnet 0.2.0 * power_assert 1.1.3 * rake 12.3.2 * rdoc 6.1.2 * test-unit 3.2.9 * xmlrpc 0.3.0 I found some of them exists as rubygem port in ports tree. And some of such ports has same version as above. That is, removing this patch results in installed file conflict with some rubygem ports. So this patch shouldn't be removed. I also found there isn't port of did_you_mean gem in ports tree. S= o it may be we should create it. >From this result I think we need to review other patches and understand what they do and/or why they are necessary. Furthermore, it may be we need to ask ourselves following fundamental quest= ion. "What should (or shouldn't) be install by this port?" To be honest, I think I should have made consensus about answer to this question with others before I start creating lang/ruby26 port. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237833-21402-j4Y7VDTzGa>