From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 17 06:47:48 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B537216A405;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 06:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EB943D46;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 06:47:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2])
	by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 235ECB859;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 09:47:47 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 43520 invoked by uid 1002);
	Wed, 17 May 2006 06:47:47 -0000
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:47:47 +0300
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Paul Koch <paul.koch@statseeker.com>
Message-ID: <20060517064747.GC42089@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
References: <200605171353.37745.paul.koch@statseeker.com>
	<200605171508.07228.paul.koch@statseeker.com>
	<20060517060026.GA40653@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
	<200605171615.29000.paul.koch@statseeker.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200605171615.29000.paul.koch@statseeker.com>
X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Subject: Re: Is it safe to compile multiple ports at the same time ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:47:49 -0000


--FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:15:28PM +1000, Paul Koch wrote:
[...]
> Yep, in your example above, it won't be any faster.  But what if I want=
=20
> to do something like:
>=20
>  port A depends on  Q R S T X
>  port B depends on  D E F G X
>=20
> then lots of simultaneous building can occur until they both hit port X.
>=20
Agreed.

--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv

Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
                -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

--FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFEascTFw6SP/bBpCARAkLbAKCbLZjkJw4jEDFJEhjLMhMssRPPKACfWdpU
lYx5xWzHQBuGTXVTWKaSU2Y=
=66yS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya--