From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 15 8:39:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC8A37BC52 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 08:39:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13Oioh-000Pd4-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:39:51 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA39344 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:39:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:39:51 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: speed/responsiveness of FreeBSD and X Message-ID: <20000815163951.B39188@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I recently read from someone who got the impression that X under FreeBSD seemed slower/less responsive than Linux. This wasn't an attempt to slam BSD, and i don't know config details, but is this likely? Or could there just be a *perceived* slowness for some reason? jm -- o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o | ~~~~~~~~~~~ jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org ~~~~~~~~~~~ | | "I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself." | o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message