Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:38:29 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/www is too full Message-ID: <16761.17813.713808.55826@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410221128530.16582-100000@pancho> References: <16761.12913.961269.232207@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410221128530.16582-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon writes: > There is also the school of thought that we ought to identify > what problem we are trying to solve, and if it's merely a > 'search/browse' type of problem, then we should fix our > search/browse interfaces and leave the directory layout alone. > > Unfortunately, this school of thought seems to have only one > adherent, which is myself :-) Coung mr in. It occurs we may be looking at multiple "problems", which may or may mot have compatible solutions. Someone mentioned finding a (popular) port with a known name; I often want to look at all programs which do <foo>, where FOO is far more detailed than the existing categories support. Anyone else? Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16761.17813.713808.55826>