From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 03:04:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD29F106566B for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 839273@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BD58FC1E for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so1231841gwa.17 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:04:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WlPjoPQKTLclTe+6uRq/zk8pmz0FOS17L1hfidGQ+z8=; b=SiesUgNjz1vsZvy7fIzNcY+hHPxbBorNQeEUyMGfCIlir7QzUr8ovaKqABzd401sHS FPSmD7ODwY4GawWwPXwWC3PmXWWAWaXIFrwSDIRxAhi2ZWO7q6BNvKG4IOruR1mY28g0 B7xH3WbScQCsqkOdJj1JRCBV5rNJV0GkWgUZk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WbttexKQ9ykGyQLc1INv4kxLoRkktRq9n28qaGxheYL9fv7d4DoIIcbNpE8jfVVgLD 2OFV+1Bl0WIVE3De5dLXcPITxv4bMbNPV2Th3OWbOhaycBcNys1BJb6jPkwq+M7W8DM2 TXy7yiarlveYL9MAvw8XR7+2xllavQyDPybvg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.145.9 with SMTP id s9mr2898321ybd.125.1298603051658; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:04:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: 839273@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.215.21 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:04:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20110224234044.0df661c1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110224225425.GB13490@guilt.hydra> <20110225001301.e4f6d95f.freebsd@edvax.de> <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20110224232404.GA13838@guilt.hydra> <20110225002644.GA14159@guilt.hydra> <20110225010037.GA25929@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:34:11 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TCUMX7HGz_C0O2tkbJZsPhslhmw Message-ID: From: Andres Perera To: Rob Farmer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Chip Camden , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 839273@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:04:14 -0000 On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Rob Farmer wro= te: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andres Perera wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden >> wrote: >>> >>> -- >>> Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F >>> http://chipsquips.com =C2=A0| http://camdensoftware.com =C2=A0 | http:/= /chipstips.com >>> >> >> btw, would you stop putting ads on your signature? it's annoying >> > > LOL - how hypocritical. This thread was four days dead then suddenly > two people show up and start pushing this mksh shell, which seems to > be part of some obscure OpenBSD fork. If anyone is "advertising" it's > you. actually, *any* modern ksh variant, including both oksh and mksh would be better than tcsh as default shell. both would be a huge improvement over th= e rotting pile of poop that is tcsh and if you're going to qualify, you better know wtf you're talking about, because mksh is used by android and red hat the only major os, excluding variants, with tcsh on the base system is free= bsd nevermind that the tcsh comparison was done way before anyone explained mks= h... noob > > -- > Rob Farmer >