Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 May 2000 10:15:43 +0800 (TSD)
From:      Victor Sudakov <sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru>
To:        keith@mail.telestream.com
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Anyone using dump(8)
Message-ID:  <200005310215.e4V2FiF13627@sibptus.tomsk.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005292244240.27088-100000@mail.telestream.com> from "keith@mail.telestream.com" at "May 29, 2000 11: 6:51 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
keith@mail.telestream.com wrote:
> I use dump every day. Seeing that I had a million of my questions
> answered from the list not to long ago I'll repay the debt on your
> questions. :) 
> 
> #1 If file systems are to be mouted read only durring a dump then it's
> news to me. I've never heard of it and have never done it. A quick look at
> the man page for dump doesn't say this either.

I remember reading somewhere that the file system should be quiet.
Just imagine that a file is modified in the middle of the dump, after
the mapping. Besides, a file can be in the disk cache etc.
> 
> #2 I use dump for 5 servers on my network to a single machine.

Did you read the tapes after the dump? ;-)

> Works realy good. You have to allow for rsh because dump will use it to do
> the dirty work. Not exactly secure but if you aren't doing dumps in a cron
> script then you can just enable rsh durring the times you prefer to do the
> dumps.
> 
> #3 You don't have to be single user to do a dump. That would kind of
> defeat the use of a network dump. 
> 
> #4 I'm not entirely sure about this but as far as doing a dump on an
> active file system. Dump takes a sort of snapshot of the file system
> before it starts pumping data to tape. So files modified durring a dump
> will only have the data as it was before dump took the snap of it. 
> As soon as you issue the dump command your disks will go crazy as dump
> figures out what all needs to be dumped. I just kind of assumed <ouch>
> that it was snaping the file system. Or depending on the level of dump you

When dump(8) dumps a 10 Gigabyte filesystem, there is certainly no
room for another 10 Gigabytes for a snapshot. 

> are doing will be looking to see the modification dates on files to
> determine what needs dumping.
> Anyone with more info on this I'd like to know about it.
> 
> 
> #5 I've never known anyone to halt services while dumping a file system.

So what is going to happen to the files that change during the dump? I
think they will be unreadable because dump mapped them with their old
size and will have dumped them with a different size or truncate the
end of them or whatever.

> 
> 
> Hope that answered some questions.
> 
> Keith W.
> 
> At the helm <for better or worse>
> =================================
> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 May 2000, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> 
> > Hello.
> > 
> > I wonder if anyone uses dump(8) nowadays in a production environment.
> > It seems the best backup tool as it preserves hard links, sparce files
> > etc. However, there are some practical questions I need enlightment
> > on.
> > 
> > 1. You are supposed to mount a filesystem readonly before you dump it,
> > right? Then dump cannot write /etc/dumpdates and aborts. Moreover, I
> > cannot stop the services every time I need to dump a filesystem. How
> > do you deal with that?
> > 
> > 2. The tape drive is only on one host, so I need to dump filesystems
> > over the network. I can boot in single user mode, mount the
> > filesystems readonly, but then I have to do all the ifconfig, route
> > etc. stuff (to see the tape server) by hand which is annoying.
> > 
> > 3. Is dump really so vulnerable to modifications of filesystems during
> > dump? Then how is it supposed to work on non-stop systems?
> > 
> > Surely there must be some know-how. People seem to have been using
> > dump(8) for years, and in huge companies too. I only have to dump 11
> > boxes, some with very important data updated every 20 minutes or so,
> > to a tape drive on one of the boxes.  Dump users, please reply.
> > 
> > Any input is greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
> > 2:5005/149@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
> > 
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> > 
> 


-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/149@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005310215.e4V2FiF13627>