Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 05:13:07 +0900 From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> Cc: gnats-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/32146: portupgrade-20011118 fails to build packages of dependent ports Message-ID: <86adx855ws.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: <15363.61006.146855.290374@onceler.kciLink.com> References: <200111202107.fAKL7cu10099@onceler.kciLink.com> <200111202120.fAKLK0418030@freefall.freebsd.org> <15363.61006.146855.290374@onceler.kciLink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:49:34 -0500,
Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> One more note... when I do this:
>
> portupgrade -Rrpv -f portupgrade
>
> it builds package files for all the dependencies as well. It seems
> that the -N case fails to do so, which is why I thought it was a bug,
> not a missing feature.
Quote from the manpage:
--package Build a package when each port is installed.
Because specifying -Rrf makes portupgrade build and _install_ all the
required/dependent ports, it builds packages for them according as the
-p flag while it's at it.
It doesn't package tarballs for packages that are not installed during
a session, after all.
I think I'll consider adding some -r/-R/-x flags and wild card support
to pkg_tarup(1), because packaging is certainly not portupgrade's
willing job.
--
/
/__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
/ ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp
"Somewhere out of a memory.. of lighted streets on quiet nights.."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86adx855ws.wl>