From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 23 10:12:11 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D5716A41F;
	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:12:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DC643D7E;
	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:12:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCAEBC66;
	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC)
To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:05:03 +0800."
	<43ABCBCF.8060500@freebsd.org> 
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:12:07 +0100
Message-ID: <26940.1135332727@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:12:12 -0000

In message <43ABCBCF.8060500@freebsd.org>, David Xu writes:

>If I have linked " aj>>>>>>>" to /etc/malloc.conf for phkmalloc, the
>super-smack get better result, on my Pentium-D 2.8Ghz machine,
>before this set,  the select-key.smack can only reach 19500 q_per_s,
>after the set, it can reach 20791.33 q_per_s !


yes, this is not suprising.


>The '>' option should be supported in jemalloc because mysql relies
>on it.

That is indeed a strange usage of the word "relies" and it sort of
indicates that you don't even have the foggiest notion about what
the '>' option does in phkmalloc.

Maybe a reading of the relevant manual page might be in order ?

Poul-Henning

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.